United States Government Considers Google For Public-Utility Type Regulation

As Indomitus has repeatedly warned, Google is a lying, biased, communist, anti-American, anti-Christian, atheistic, greed and control organization. They create bias systems. Their whole business is organized around creating bias, as ‘bias’ drives ad sales. Since bias is in their blood, and since the employers and employees are all of the group-think genre of ‘anything goes’ leftism, they will develop bias engines instinctively, without even giving it much thought.

Google/YouTube promotes mindless drivel.  Alternative sources are slowly choked to death in the Google system.  Socialism and globalism are consistently promoted.  If you have viewpoints opposed to Google’s objectives of global government based on the Communist Chinese model, with Google as the mind-control watchdog over planet earth, you get silenced.

Indomitus’ Google traffic since reporting on Google

Google is a vital core component of Bilderberg-centric global governance, and they look toward China for their model of world government. Google is developing for China a search engine that reports to police anyone who searches for things like “liberty” or “freedom” or “President Xi sucks”, and it reports the searcher AS HE SEARCHES, along with the PHONE NUMBER of the device and the LOCATION/location tracking data so that poor man or woman of boy or girl can be ARRESTED IMMEDIATELY.

You or your children or your grand-children will eventually be in the Google Dragonfly web, and that’s a prison, dear reader.  A “Thought Prison?: whereby you are arrested for even inquiring about information on anything contrary to communist group-think.  If you have thoughts that are “illegal”, you will be picked up by the police and taken away WITHIN MINUTES, possibly never to be seen again.


GOOGLE was doing this secretly until one of their software engineers said “HELL NO”, quit and reported it. Not the genie is out and Google wants to try to stuff it back into the darkness where people cannot see it.

Since we started reporting on Google extensively a couple of weeks ago, our traffic from Google has… fallen to zero as of today.

White House Draft Executive Order Regulating Major Internet Media

The White House has drafted an executive order (provided in full here) for President Donald Trump’s signature that would instruct federal antitrust and law enforcement agencies to open probes into the practices of Alphabet Inc.’s Google, Facebook Inc., and other social media companies.

The order is in its preliminary stages and hasn’t yet been run past other government agencies, said a White House official. Bloomberg News obtained a draft of the order.
White House Drafts Order to Look Into Google, Facebook

The document instructs U.S. antitrust authorities to “thoroughly investigate whether any online platform has acted in violation of the antitrust laws.” It instructs other government agencies to recommend within a month after it’s signed, actions that could potentially “protect competition among online platforms and address online platform bias.”

The document doesn’t name any companies. If signed, the order would represent a significant escalation of Trump’s aversion to Google, Facebook, Twitter and other social media companies, whom he’s publicly accused of silencing conservative voices and news sources online.

The press offices of Google, Facebook and Twitter didn’t respond Saturday to emails and telephone calls requesting comment outside of normal office hours.

“Social Media is totally discriminating against Republican/Conservative voices,” Trump said on Twitter in August. “Speaking loudly and clearly for the Trump Administration, we won’t let that happen. They are closing down the opinions of many people on the RIGHT, while at the same time doing nothing to others.”

Social media companies have acknowledged in congressional hearings that their efforts to enforce prohibitions against online harassment have sometimes led to erroneous punishment of political figures on both the left and the right, and that once discovered, those mistakes have been corrected. They say there’s no systematic effort to silence conservative voices.

The draft order directs that any actions federal agencies take should be “consistent with other laws” — an apparent nod to concerns that it could threaten the traditional independence of U.S. law enforcement or conflict with the First Amendment, which protects political views from government regulation.

“Because of their critical role in American society, it is essential that American citizens are protected from anticompetitive acts by dominant online platforms,” the order says. It adds that consumer harm — a key measure in antitrust investigations– could come “through the exercise of bias.”

The order’s preliminary status is reflected in the text of the draft, which includes a note in red that the first section could be expanded “if necessary, to provide more detail on role of platforms and the importance of competition.”

White House Drafts Order to Look Into Google, Facebook

The possibility of an executive order  (Read it here) emerged as Attorney General Jeff Sessions prepares for a Sept. 25 briefing by state attorneys general who are already investigating the tech firms’ practices.

The meeting, which will include a representative of the Justice Department’s antitrust division, is intended to help Sessions decide if there’s a federal case to be made against the companies, two people familiar with the matter have said. At least one of the attorneys general participating in the meeting has indicated he seeks to break up the companies.

Growing movements on the right and the left argue that companies including Google and Facebook engage in anti-competitive behavior. The companies reject the accusation, arguing they face robust competition and that many of their products are free. Bias has not typically figured in antitrust examinations.
White House Drafts Order to Look Into Google, Facebook

In July, for instance, Twitter algorithms limited the visibility of some Republicans in profile searches. Jack Dorsey, the company’s chief executive officer, testified before Congress in September that the limits also affected some Democrats as the site tried to enforce policies against threats, hate, harassment or other forms of abusive speech. The moves were reversed.

A Pew Research Center survey earlier this year found that 72 percent of Americans, and 85 percent of Republicans, think it’s likely that social media companies intentionally censor political viewpoints that those companies find objectionable.