ANTIFA – Austin, TX Threatens to ANNIHILATE Others

Interesting threats originating from Austin, TX, where about half the adults carry concealed weapons, and others openly carry firearms.  Antifa really stands for “All Nitwits, Trogs, Idiots, Failures & Assholes”.  They fancy themselves a reincarnation of the Hitlerian Antifa, but nah.  These panty-waist ultra-pale punks simply have nothing better to do and they want the other losers in their circle of nitwits, trogs, idiots, failures and assholes to think they are “fighting the man”.

But even 10,000 antifas won’t do anything but galvanize their enemy if they pick a fight with 500,000 armed Texans.  How stupid are these losers?  It would be the end of all nitwits, trogs, idiots, failures and assholes if they start a fight in Austin.  Austin is the liberal sphincter of the great State of Texas, but there are many, many thousands of armed freemen and women in Austin.  They will arrive at the “scene of the event” by the Ford F-350 Turbo-load if all the nitwits, trogs, idiots, failures and assholes show up waving sticks and hitting people.  In Texas, that’s enough to put a hot bullet through the villains septum.

A recent blog post from the far-left group’s website calls to form a “Red Army”:

“…we encourage the formation of paramilitary organizations on two levels. The first being those who are mainly unarmed but are prepared and trained to carry out fist fighting or using blunt weapons like axe handles or flagpoles as well as shields and basic armoring. The second level is the more advanced embryo of a Red Army, which is trained militarily and operates as soldiers all the time, engaging in production and mass work among the proletariat and the oppressed nation’s people.”


They go on to advocate for unyielding “physical confrontation” towards anyone they consider to be a fascist stating:


“It is time for Austin to stand up, to shake off bad leadership trying to impose itself on antifascism and come together under a better model of actual resistance and not token performance. When we organize and lead actions the fascists do not march every step they take is met with physical confrontation and they are bombarded from all sides.


The group closes the post out by solidifying their commitment to being a violent terrorist group by stating they’re prepared to “annihilate” those they consider to be “fascists” or “collaborators”:


On the basis of our principled united front work, fascists and their collaborators can be drowned out, run out, routed, beaten bloody, and even annihilated. These are our principles and we aim to hold them to the very finish.”


Far Left Watch has reported on similar violent cells that operate openly and freely across the country. The latest blog post by the Red Guards of Austin, is one of many that openly call for “armed resistance” and “revolutionary violence.”

Social media is essential to the Red Guards Austin’s ability to not only recruit, but also radicalize and mobilize other far-left extremists. With almost 8,000 followers on the Austin cell’s Facebook group page, and constant posts calling for other angry and violent masked individuals to join, why is a group such as this able to continue using the platform to recruit and insight violence?

Social media platforms have claimed that they don’t shadowban, rather a set algorithm searches for patterns and certain buzz words to censor those who violate their Terms of Service. One would think with the militant rhetoric that’s pushed by the Red Guard Austin group on social media platforms that algorithms would have identified this group long ago for violating the Terms of Service and censor them or remove their accounts all together.

Yet, they’re openly calling to form violent militias, trained and ready to physically attack others based on what their idea of fascism is, while conservative accounts are being censored and shadow-banned for posting things these social media platforms don’t want to gain any traction that have no mention of violence or hatred. How can any of these social media platforms claim there’s no bias with a straight face?